Risk Assessments: A Waste of Time or an Auditor’s Gold Mine?
June 9, 2025
Risk assessments have long been a staple of corporate governance, internal audit, and compliance frameworks. Yet, for many in management, they often feel like a bureaucratic exercise with little tangible value, but why?
Risk assessments tend to be time-consuming and subjective and, more often than not, fail to translate into actionable business decisions. So, are risk assessments obsolete, or is this just a classic disconnect between management and auditors? Let's visit some of the main reasons:
- They Rarely Translate into Action
Many organizations conduct risk assessments because it’s required, not because they see real value in them. After lengthy workshops and discussions, risks are documented, ranked, and mapped, but little action follows. The results often sit in a report until the next cycle, making the exercise feel futile. - Subjectivity Over Substance
Most risk assessments rely on qualitative measures—such as “high,” “medium,” and “low” risk—determined through discussions and surveys. Without data-driven analysis, management questions whether these risk ratings are truly meaningful or just educated guesses. - Misalignment with Business Strategy
While auditors and risk professionals focus on control deficiencies, compliance risks, and financial exposures, management is more concerned with growth, profitability, and market competition. Risk assessments often fail to align with the strategic priorities of the business, making them seem disconnected from real operational concerns.
The Real Issue: Risk Assessments Need to Evolve
The disconnect between management and auditors isn’t because risk assessments have no value; they are often executed poorly. To bridge this gap, organizations must modernize their approach:
- Integrate risk assessments with strategic planning to make them more relevant to business decisions.
- Leverage real-time data and analytics instead of relying on subjective rankings.
- Move from periodic assessments to continuous risk monitoring to ensure that risks are always current.
- Ensure follow-through by linking risk assessment findings to action plans with clear accountability.
- Risk assessments aren’t obsolete, but the traditional way they’re done is. If organizations can shift from a compliance-driven mindset to a strategic, data-informed approach, they can become valuable tools for auditors and management alike.
Let’s connect and transform the way you approach compliance and audit. Together, we’ll achieve excellence—let’s make it happen!
About the author: David Zapata
David is a passionate Chief Audit Executive with 15+ years of experience in SOX compliance, risk management, and fraud investigations. He is the founder and principal of RiskWiseAdvisory LLC
The Case: This is a real-life situation where a mid-sized manufacturing client almost wired $250,000 to a vendor for an urgent equipment payment. The email looked legit—same logo, "CFO"-approved, and even referenced an actual project. Their new dual-approval rule required a second sign-off. When the AP manager called the CFO to confirm, he was unaware of the request. The 5-Minute Fix That Prevented Disaster: A month prior, we noted that there was no training on Vendor Management, so we offered a quick two-hour workshop that covered the basics of potential red flags. Three weeks went by, and the client received a suspicious e-mail where they did exactly what we showed in the workshop: 1. Verified the email domain – The "reply-to" address was subtly incorrect (e.g., "vend0r.com" vs. "vendor.com"). 2. Called the vendor – Used a pre-approved contact number (not the one provided in the email). 3. Transaction was blocked – The vendor's account was fake. Why This Matters: This was a classic Business Email Compromise (BEC) scam, the #1 fraud threat, according to the FBI. -The client’s only protection? A simple control was added 3 weeks earlier. Fraud costs businesses an estimated 5% of their annual revenue (ACFE). Worse yet, small and mid-sized businesses are the most vulnerable , often lacking the robust controls of larger corporations. The good news? 80% of fraud can be prevented with simple, proactive measures. To help you safeguard your business, we’ve compiled a 20-Point Fraud Prevention Checklist —based on industry best practices and real-world fraud cases. How to Implement These Controls Start Small: Focus on high-risk areas, such as payments and payroll. Train Employees: Ensure staff recognizes fraud red flags. Use Technology: Automate controls where possible (e.g., MFA, positive pay). Review Regularly: Update policies as fraud tactics evolve. Why Fraud Prevention Matters Fraud isn’t just a financial loss—it can damage your reputation, disrupt operations, and even lead to legal consequences . Common schemes include: Employee theft (e.g., payroll fraud, expense padding) Vendor fraud (fake invoices, altered payment details) Cyber fraud (phishing, business email compromise) Implementing strong controls reduces risk, improves compliance, and builds trust with stakeholders. Need Help? Get a Free Fraud Risk Assessment Fraud prevention is proactive, not reactive . If you’re unsure where to start: ✅ Download our Full Fraud Prevention Checklist ✅ Book a Free Consultation to assess your risks Protect your business today—before fraud strikes. Final Thoughts Fraudsters target weaknesses, not just businesses . By implementing these 20 controls , you’ll drastically reduce risk and create a culture of accountability . Which control will you implement first? Let us know in the comments!
Tariffs have long been a powerful economic tool, but their impact on global trade and supply chains can create significant business risks. As new tariffs emerge or existing ones shift, companies must act swiftly to reassess their risk exposure.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept—it’s here, transforming industries and reshaping how businesses operate. For internal auditors and compliance professionals, understanding AI isn’t just an option; it’s a necessity. AI presents both opportunities and risks, and professionals in these roles must be equipped to navigate this evolving landscape.